Radial velocity fitting¶

In this tutorial, we will demonstrate how to fit radial velocity observations of an exoplanetary system using exoplanet. We will follow the getting started tutorial from the excellent RadVel package where they fit for the parameters of the two planets in the K2-24 system.

First, let’s download the data from RadVel:

[3]:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/California-Planet-Search/radvel/master/example_data/epic203771098.csv"
data = pd.read_csv(url, index_col=0)

x = np.array(data.t)
y = np.array(data.vel)
yerr = np.array(data.errvel)

# Compute a reference time that will be used to normalize the trends model
x_ref = 0.5 * (x.min() + x.max())

# Also make a fine grid that spans the observation window for plotting purposes
t = np.linspace(x.min() - 5, x.max() + 5, 1000)

plt.errorbar(x, y, yerr=yerr, fmt=".k")
plt.xlabel("time [days]")
_ = plt.ylabel("radial velocity [m/s]")

Now, we know the periods and transit times for the planets from the K2 light curve, so let’s start by using the exoplanet.estimate_semi_amplitude() function to estimate the expected RV semi-amplitudes for the planets.

[4]:

import exoplanet as xo

periods = [20.8851, 42.3633]
period_errs = [0.0003, 0.0006]
t0s = [2072.7948, 2082.6251]
t0_errs = [0.0007, 0.0004]
Ks = xo.estimate_semi_amplitude(periods, x, y, yerr, t0s=t0s)
print(Ks, "m/s")

[5.05069163 5.50983542] m/s

[5]:

0.5 * (
    np.log(np.array(periods) + np.array(period_errs))
    - np.log(np.array(periods) - np.array(period_errs))
)

[5]:

array([1.43643076e-05, 1.41632026e-05])

[6]:

np.array(period_errs) / np.array(periods)

[6]:

array([1.43643076e-05, 1.41632026e-05])

The radial velocity model in PyMC3¶

Now that we have the data and an estimate of the initial values for the parameters, let’s start defining the probabilistic model in PyMC3 (take a look at A quick intro to PyMC3 for exoplaneteers if you’re new to PyMC3). First, we’ll define our priors on the parameters:

[7]:

import pymc3 as pm
import pymc3_ext as pmx
import aesara_theano_fallback.tensor as tt

with pm.Model() as model:

    # Gaussian priors based on transit data (from Petigura et al.)
    t0 = pm.Normal("t0", mu=np.array(t0s), sd=np.array(t0_errs), shape=2)
    logP = pm.Normal(
        "logP",
        mu=np.log(periods),
        sd=np.array(period_errs) / np.array(periods),
        shape=2,
        testval=np.log(periods),
    )
    P = pm.Deterministic("P", tt.exp(logP))

    # Wide log-normal prior for semi-amplitude
    logK = pm.Normal(
        "logK", mu=np.log(Ks), sd=2.0, shape=2, testval=np.log(Ks)
    )

    # Eccentricity & argument of periasteron
    ecs = pmx.UnitDisk("ecs", shape=(2, 2), testval=0.01 * np.ones((2, 2)))
    ecc = pm.Deterministic("ecc", tt.sum(ecs ** 2, axis=0))
    omega = pm.Deterministic("omega", tt.arctan2(ecs[1], ecs[0]))
    xo.eccentricity.vaneylen19(
        "ecc_prior", multi=True, shape=2, fixed=True, observed=ecc
    )

    # Jitter & a quadratic RV trend
    logs = pm.Normal("logs", mu=np.log(np.median(yerr)), sd=5.0)
    trend = pm.Normal("trend", mu=0, sd=10.0 ** -np.arange(3)[::-1], shape=3)

    # Then we define the orbit
    orbit = xo.orbits.KeplerianOrbit(period=P, t0=t0, ecc=ecc, omega=omega)

    # And a function for computing the full RV model
    def get_rv_model(t, name=""):
        # First the RVs induced by the planets
        vrad = orbit.get_radial_velocity(t, K=tt.exp(logK))
        pm.Deterministic("vrad" + name, vrad)

        # Define the background model
        A = np.vander(t - x_ref, 3)
        bkg = pm.Deterministic("bkg" + name, tt.dot(A, trend))

        # Sum over planets and add the background to get the full model
        return pm.Deterministic("rv_model" + name, tt.sum(vrad, axis=-1) + bkg)

    # Define the RVs at the observed times
    rv_model = get_rv_model(x)

    # Also define the model on a fine grid as computed above (for plotting)
    rv_model_pred = get_rv_model(t, name="_pred")

    # Finally add in the observation model. This next line adds a new contribution
    # to the log probability of the PyMC3 model
    err = tt.sqrt(yerr ** 2 + tt.exp(2 * logs))
    pm.Normal("obs", mu=rv_model, sd=err, observed=y)

Now, we can plot the initial model:

[8]:

plt.errorbar(x, y, yerr=yerr, fmt=".k")

with model:
    plt.plot(t, pmx.eval_in_model(model.vrad_pred), "--k", alpha=0.5)
    plt.plot(t, pmx.eval_in_model(model.bkg_pred), ":k", alpha=0.5)
    plt.plot(t, pmx.eval_in_model(model.rv_model_pred), label="model")

plt.legend(fontsize=10)
plt.xlim(t.min(), t.max())
plt.xlabel("time [days]")
plt.ylabel("radial velocity [m/s]")
_ = plt.title("initial model")

In this plot, the background is the dotted line, the individual planets are the dashed lines, and the full model is the blue line.

It doesn’t look amazing so let’s fit for the maximum a posterior parameters.

[9]:

with model:
    map_soln = pmx.optimize(start=model.test_point, vars=[trend])
    map_soln = pmx.optimize(start=map_soln, vars=[t0, trend, logK, logP, logs])
    map_soln = pmx.optimize(start=map_soln, vars=[ecs])
    map_soln = pmx.optimize(start=map_soln)

optimizing logp for variables: [trend]

100.00% [13/13 00:00<00:00 logp = -5.742e+01]

message: Optimization terminated successfully.
logp: -68.03907701822232 -> -57.42134937391673
optimizing logp for variables: [logs, logP, logK, trend, t0]

100.00% [40/40 00:00<00:00 logp = -5.182e+01]

message: Optimization terminated successfully.
logp: -57.42134937391673 -> -51.81968815504231
optimizing logp for variables: [ecs]

100.00% [19/19 00:00<00:00 logp = -5.094e+01]

message: Optimization terminated successfully.
logp: -51.81968815504231 -> -50.9355953932712
optimizing logp for variables: [trend, logs, ecs, logK, logP, t0]

100.00% [31/31 00:00<00:00 logp = -5.077e+01]

message: Optimization terminated successfully.
logp: -50.9355953932712 -> -50.765648030597454

[10]:

plt.errorbar(x, y, yerr=yerr, fmt=".k")
plt.plot(t, map_soln["vrad_pred"], "--k", alpha=0.5)
plt.plot(t, map_soln["bkg_pred"], ":k", alpha=0.5)
plt.plot(t, map_soln["rv_model_pred"], label="model")

plt.legend(fontsize=10)
plt.xlim(t.min(), t.max())
plt.xlabel("time [days]")
plt.ylabel("radial velocity [m/s]")
_ = plt.title("MAP model")

That looks better.

Sampling¶

Now that we have our model set up and a good estimate of the initial parameters, let’s start sampling. There are substantial covariances between some of the parameters so we’ll use the pmx.sample function from pymc3-ext which wraps pm.sample function with some better defaults and tuning strategies.

[11]:

np.random.seed(42)
with model:
    trace = pmx.sample(
        tune=4000,
        draws=4000,
        cores=2,
        chains=2,
        target_accept=0.95,
    )

Multiprocess sampling (2 chains in 2 jobs)
NUTS: [trend, logs, ecs, logK, logP, t0]

100.00% [16000/16000 01:06<00:00 Sampling 2 chains, 0 divergences]

/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.2/x64/lib/python3.9/site-packages/exoplanet/theano_ops/kepler.py:32: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in remainder
  driver.kepler(M % (2 * np.pi), ecc, sinf, cosf)
/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.9.2/x64/lib/python3.9/site-packages/exoplanet/theano_ops/kepler.py:32: RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in remainder
  driver.kepler(M % (2 * np.pi), ecc, sinf, cosf)
Sampling 2 chains for 4_000 tune and 4_000 draw iterations (8_000 + 8_000 draws total) took 67 seconds.

After sampling, it’s always a good idea to do some convergence checks. First, let’s check the number of effective samples and the Gelman-Rubin statistic for our parameters of interest:

[12]:

import arviz as az

az.summary(
    trace, var_names=["trend", "logs", "omega", "ecc", "t0", "logK", "P"]
)

[12]:

	mean	sd	hdi_3%	hdi_97%	mcse_mean	mcse_sd	ess_bulk	ess_tail	r_hat
trend[0]	0.001	0.001	-0.001	0.002	0.000	0.000	10657.0	5585.0	1.0
trend[1]	-0.041	0.024	-0.084	0.005	0.000	0.000	9277.0	4873.0	1.0
trend[2]	-1.854	0.792	-3.384	-0.435	0.008	0.006	9818.0	5770.0	1.0
logs	1.121	0.210	0.741	1.528	0.003	0.002	6000.0	5316.0	1.0
omega[0]	0.007	1.187	-2.206	2.703	0.013	0.010	8114.0	6428.0	1.0
omega[1]	-0.314	1.968	-3.040	2.938	0.021	0.015	8233.0	7667.0	1.0
ecc[0]	0.085	0.087	0.000	0.271	0.002	0.001	3163.0	3991.0	1.0
ecc[1]	0.049	0.058	0.000	0.112	0.001	0.001	3663.0	2174.0	1.0
t0[0]	2072.795	0.001	2072.793	2072.796	0.000	0.000	12037.0	5572.0	1.0
t0[1]	2082.625	0.000	2082.624	2082.626	0.000	0.000	11822.0	5502.0	1.0
logK[0]	1.511	0.255	1.080	1.935	0.005	0.003	6496.0	2878.0	1.0
logK[1]	1.495	0.254	1.043	1.943	0.003	0.002	7223.0	4064.0	1.0
P[0]	20.885	0.000	20.885	20.886	0.000	0.000	12303.0	5603.0	1.0
P[1]	42.363	0.001	42.362	42.364	0.000	0.000	12627.0	6047.0	1.0

It looks like everything is pretty much converged here. Not bad for 14 parameters and about a minute of runtime…

Then we can make a corner plot of any combination of the parameters. For example, let’s look at period, semi-amplitude, and eccentricity:

[13]:

import corner

with model:
    _ = corner.corner(trace, var_names=["P", "logK", "ecc", "omega"])

Finally, let’s plot the plosterior constraints on the RV model and compare those to the data:

[14]:

plt.errorbar(x, y, yerr=yerr, fmt=".k")

# Compute the posterior predictions for the RV model
pred = np.percentile(trace["rv_model_pred"], [16, 50, 84], axis=0)
plt.plot(t, pred[1], color="C0", label="model")
art = plt.fill_between(t, pred[0], pred[2], color="C0", alpha=0.3)
art.set_edgecolor("none")

plt.legend(fontsize=10)
plt.xlim(t.min(), t.max())
plt.xlabel("time [days]")
plt.ylabel("radial velocity [m/s]")
_ = plt.title("posterior constraints")

Phase plots¶

It might be also be interesting to look at the phased plots for this system. Here we’ll fold the dataset on the median of posterior period and then overplot the posterior constraint on the folded model orbits.

[15]:

for n, letter in enumerate("bc"):
    plt.figure()

    # Get the posterior median orbital parameters
    p = np.median(trace["P"][:, n])
    t0 = np.median(trace["t0"][:, n])

    # Compute the median of posterior estimate of the background RV
    # and the contribution from the other planet. Then we can remove
    # this from the data to plot just the planet we care about.
    other = np.median(trace["vrad"][:, :, (n + 1) % 2], axis=0)
    other += np.median(trace["bkg"], axis=0)

    # Plot the folded data
    x_fold = (x - t0 + 0.5 * p) % p - 0.5 * p
    plt.errorbar(x_fold, y - other, yerr=yerr, fmt=".k")

    # Compute the posterior prediction for the folded RV model for this
    # planet
    t_fold = (t - t0 + 0.5 * p) % p - 0.5 * p
    inds = np.argsort(t_fold)
    pred = np.percentile(trace["vrad_pred"][:, inds, n], [16, 50, 84], axis=0)
    plt.plot(t_fold[inds], pred[1], color="C0", label="model")
    art = plt.fill_between(
        t_fold[inds], pred[0], pred[2], color="C0", alpha=0.3
    )
    art.set_edgecolor("none")

    plt.legend(fontsize=10)
    plt.xlim(-0.5 * p, 0.5 * p)
    plt.xlabel("phase [days]")
    plt.ylabel("radial velocity [m/s]")
    plt.title("K2-24{0}".format(letter))

Citations¶

As described in the Citing exoplanet & its dependencies tutorial, we can use exoplanet.citations.get_citations_for_model() to construct an acknowledgement and BibTeX listing that includes the relevant citations for this model.

[16]:

with model:
    txt, bib = xo.citations.get_citations_for_model()
print(txt)

This research made use of \textsf{exoplanet} \citep{exoplanet} and its
dependencies \citep{exoplanet:arviz, exoplanet:astropy13, exoplanet:astropy18,
exoplanet:exoplanet, exoplanet:pymc3, exoplanet:theano, exoplanet:vaneylen19}.

[17]:

print("\n".join(bib.splitlines()[:10]) + "\n...")


@misc{exoplanet:exoplanet,
  author = {Daniel Foreman-Mackey and Arjun Savel and Rodrigo Luger and
            Ian Czekala and Eric Agol and Adrian Price-Whelan and
            Christina Hedges and Emily Gilbert and Tom Barclay and Luke Bouma
            and Timothy D. Brandt},
   title = {exoplanet-dev/exoplanet v0.4.5},
   month = mar,
    year = 2021,
     doi = {10.5281/zenodo.1998447},
...

← A quick intro to PyMC3 for... Transit fitting →